Credit Recession

It is said that a credit-driven recessions are the worst of the recessions. They happen extremely infrequently, but when they happen they tend to be far worse than the usual recessions. Recessions tend to happen every 3-5 years. Usually they last about a year and wipe out maybe 10-20% of equity gains (for lack of better yard-stick to measure the "severity" of a recession).

Credit recessions tend to impact the sytem much more heavily. They tend not only to give the equity markets a whallop, but they also leave lasting marks on the financial landscape. During a typical recession a few companies go out of business, usually those with operating cash-flow issues, and the rest move on the create record profits a few years later. Credit recessions are a different beast all together though. Major companies get wiped out, banks go under in droves, and the way in which credit is extended as well as managed changes. It is said that the California banking industry is still recovering from the last credit recession, which was probably 1990-1991. Too bad for them because a lot of signs are saying we're hitting another one.

So what's so bad about a credit recession? Unlike a normal recession, they are led by banks. When credit blows up, banks tighten up their purse-strings. That means banks stop lending as freely, and they do so by making their interest rates (credit spreads) prohibitively high. Then companies stop spending because they can't finance new investments with debt any more. The equity markets tighten up because earnings suck. Suddenly the economy stops cold. Companies go under in droves because they can't get adequate funding and aren't selling their goods/services as robustly, which further affects banks and makes them widen credit spreads even more. It's a pretty disasterous cycle. At the end of the day, usually a few dozen banks go under, sometimes insurers and other financials go with them.

It looks like this time around the subprime mortgage hit may have started an unfortunate chain reaction. Losing money on subprime has made banks wary of their balance sheet issues. If they lose money on the subprime mortgage stuff, then suddenly they have to defend the amount of balance sheet they are keeping. They do so by raising interest rates and not lending out as freely as they did before. Thus we start down the cycle that I described above.

We are already seeing the effects on our financial landscape. The behemoth Citigroup has all but died, their stock price back to levels seen in the last recession. They moved from #1 in market cap to #3 in the last year or so (they were passed by Bank of America somewhat before this credit blow-out and were passed by JP Morgan just a few days ago). It looks like SIVs (Structured Investment Vehicles--I'll do a Learn the Lingo on these at some point, I may have mentioned them in another Learn the Lingo post) may "go the way of the dinosaur" as they say. Banks will have to deal with those assets on their balance sheets instead of structuring them and spinning them into their own entities. Monoline insurers are looking pretty precarious right now as the first one (Ambac) just got downgraded from AAA. I'll also try to do a Learn the Lingo on monoline insurers, but the main issue is that they insure municipal bonds. They are absolutely useless if they don't have that AAA rating because why would you want anything other than a AAA rated company insuring a state/municipality? Ambac is the second biggest insurer, and people are already talking about the biggest insurer, MBIA, also being in trouble. Bad times.

So that's where we stand now. Credit recession or not, it looks like our financial landscape has changed once again. It'll be interesting to see what happens to CDOs, subprime mortgages and other financial instruments that were hit so hard this time around. Knowing Wall Street though, they'll always find a good way to get in trouble again. In fact, those same instruments may well find their place back in the markets in due time.